Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Russian voices SP and MP and the announcer This item has been added to your Favorites.

Description Discussions 0 Comments 41 Change Notes.Дescription Discussions Comments Change Notes. This item will only be visible in searches to you, your friends, and admins. This item will only be visible to you, admins, and anyone marked as a creator. Please see the instructions page for reasons why this item might not work within Garry's Mod. This item is incompatible with Garry's Mod. If you believe your item has been removed by mistake, please contact Steam Support. They left them in Siberia for mounts whit just a blade to say alive and that just a bit from that training Which is better?Home Discussions Workshop Market Broadcasts. A few years ago i watched something about this, they sad that the Russians has the best program because its strict and the discipline is at high level. Well i think its the Russian Spetnaz because they have the best training system. Haha, if you're going from video games to trying to be a Ranger be prepared to fail hardcore.

You need to compare entities that are equal. Rangers just have more training then regular troops. They are also considered to be direct decedents of Merill's Marauders. For brute force i'd say Spetnaz, for long term in the field fighting, i'd go with the rangers. That at the very least implies they are not small special forces units for hit and run type ops but advanced troops as part of a larger formation. Remember the Rangers motto-Rangers lead the way. I think the Russians have a problem in the rely on Spetnaz for too much were as the US have many types of specialized units for different mission which gives it a flexiblity the Russians don't seem to have. Spetnaz is more of s brute force group where rangers are more of an inflitrtion type group. Being Japanese, and having worked in the Japanese self defense intelligence forces, i would say the spetsnaz, physically and mentally are far, far superior to any fighting force.ДЄnyways, they're used in seperate ways, the rangers are fantastic technically, and are excellent in hostage and anti-terrorism acts, aswell as modern warfare, while the spetsnaz are very 'old school', and go in, and finish the job quick, which usually ends in large enemy and civilian casualties, but almost guaranteed mission success. All Americans will say the Rangers, and all Anti-Americans will say the Spetsnaz, you'll only get biased opinions.

Rangers lead the way mw2